1.My Argument
Designer is the
world's greatest careers, their daily life from the subtle to see different
things, and to use more whimsy to the transformation of products which make it
more practical, to make our lives better. But in the design process, there will
be the presence of such a design: With designer out of something, but in real
life it is far from the expected useful so big. It is a world of innovation,
this is beyond doubt. With the continuous improvement of people's sense of
innovation, thought more open, acceptance is also growing, so there have been
some design ideas. While these innovations out of the product may seem like
science, in fact, true to life, but did not achieve the desired results.
Argument : Practicality or Aesthetics what is more important in
design
There are Some
Examples
Example 1
Fliz Pedal Car
Because it does
not seat, nor pedal with the gear, only the frame and the seat belt, the mode
of operation is to use the pedals. The problem is where to put the pedal after
the finish? This bike just from the aesthetic point of view, streamlined body
with yellow gives the feeling of youthful vigor,beautiful fashion. But from the usability point of view is not so
good.
This Design Problem


The Design
Highlights


According to the above description,
the comprehensive score (out of 10)
Practicality
|
Aesthetics
|
3
|
7
|
Through this value
(3-7 = -4) can prove that the product design is more biased in favor of
Aesthetics.
Example 2
Have to admit that
as a Speaker, this style is very distinctive style, avant-garde. But this is
only the body without the head speaker at home may be frightened children.
Design style is very unique, but practicality is not good, Because most people
can not accept such a strange style.
This Design Problem

The left is an
ordinary speaker sound wave trajectory, the right is a dog-shaped speaker sonic
trajectory, coverage can be seen from the sound waves is not very reasonable
this speaker design.
The Design
Highlights

According to the above
description, the comprehensive score (out of 10)
Practicality
|
Aesthetics
|
1
|
3
|
Through this value
(1-3 = -2) can prove that the product design is not neither function nor aesthetics
2.Solution
Compared Fliz
Pedal Car, we can look at this bike
The bike design
aesthetics, streamlined body, people feel very simple but not a lack of sense
of technology. In terms of functionality, and like a traditional bike, by foot
pedal to generate power.
According to the above
description, the comprehensive score (out of 10)
Practicality
|
Aesthetics
|
10
|
10
|
Through this value
(10-10 =0 can prove that the bike design is very average at practicality and
aesthetics.
Compared dog
speaker, we can look at this speaker
This speaker
design is very beautiful and very reasonable, its shape is rectangular,
covering a large area of sonic, and this speaker design is simple, but not the
lack of a classic flavor, suitable for business use but also for home.
According to the above
description, the comprehensive score (out of 10)
Practicality
|
Aesthetics
|
9
|
9
|
Through this value
(9-9 =0 can prove that the speaker design is very average at practicality and
aesthetics.
3.Summary
In modern society,
with the improvement of social material and cultural living standards. People
claim these products are rising. Whether it is the main aspect of the
usefulness of the structural performance of the performance, or the appearance
of the performance art form, it is to measure the value of the product.
designers can design some of the practical and aesthetic products, before the
production of products to find some friends to experience the feeling.
没有评论:
发表评论